NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS l NOTE 35

35 Post-retirement medical aid obligations

The company and its subsidiaries operate post-employment medical benefit schemes that cover certain of their employees and retirees. This practice has since been stopped for new employees. The liabilities are valued annually using the projected unit credit method. The latest actuarial valuation was performed on 30 September 2014.

  GROUP  
(R’million) 2014   Restated
2013
*
Balance at the end of the year        
Present value of obligations (626,4)   (580,9)  
Liability at reporting date (626,4)   (580,9)  
Movement in the liability recognised in the statement of financial position        
Balance at the beginning of the year (580,9)   (583,6)  
Contributions paid 36,2   34,2  
Other expenses included in staff costs (81,7)   (31,5)  
Current service cost (2,6)   (3,1)  
Interest cost (50,6)   (45,3)  
Actuarial (losses)/gains recognised (28,5)   16,9  
Balance at the end of the year (626,4)   (580,9)  
* The amounts have been restated due to the adoption of IAS 19R.

The employer’s estimate of contributions expected to be paid for the 2015 financial year is R38,6 million (2014: R36,2 million).

  GROUP  
(%) 2014   Restated
2013
*
The principal actuarial assumptions used for accounting purposes were:        
Discount rate 8,50   9,00  
Medical inflation 7,80   7,80  
Future salary increases 7,80   7,80  
Post-retirement mortality tables PA(90)
ultimate
rated
down
2 years
plus 1%
improvement
pa
from 2006
  PA(90)
ultimate
rated
down
2 years
plus 1%
improvement
pa
from 2006
 
* The amounts have been restated due to the adoption of IAS 19R.

The risks faced by the group as a result of the post-retirement medical aid obligation can be summarised as follows:

Inflation: The risk that future CPI inflation and healthcare cost inflation are higher than expected and uncontrolled.
Longevity: The risk that pensioners live longer than expected.
Open-ended, long-term liability: The risk that the liability may be volatile in the future and uncertain.
Future changes in legislation: The risk that changes to legislation with respect to the post-employment liability may increase the liability for Tiger Brands.
Future changes in the tax environment: The risk that changes in the tax legislation governing employee benefits may increase the liability for Tiger Brands.
Perceived inequality between current employees: The risk of dissatisfaction of current employees who are not eligible for a post-employment healthcare subsidy.
Administration: Administration of this liability poses a burden to Tiger Brands.
Enforcement of eligibility criteria and rules: The risk that eligibility criteria and rules are not strictly or consistently enforced.
35.1 Sensitivity analysis
  GROUP  
  Base case        Medical inflation  
2014        
Key assumption (%) 7,80 (1,0) 1,0  
Accrued liability 30 September 2014        
(R’million) 626,4 563,1 702,7  
% change   (10,1) 12,2  
Current service cost plus interest cost 2014/2015        
(R’million) 55,1 49,1 62,3  
% change   (10,8) 13,2  
2013 (restated)*        
Key assumption (%) 7,80 (1,0) 1,0  
Accrued liability 30 September 2013        
(R’million) 580,9 522,6 651,0  
% change   (10,0) 12,1  
Current service cost plus interest cost 2013/2014        
(R’million) 53,4 47,6 60,3  
% change   (10,8) 13,0  
* The amounts have been restated due to the adoption of IAS 19R.

  GROUP  
  Base case        Discount rate  
2014        
Key assumption (%) 8,50 (1,0) 1,0  
Present value of obligations 30 September 2014        
(R’million) 626,4 706,6 561,1  
% change   12,8 (10,4)  
2013 (restated)*        
Key assumption (%) 9,00 (1,0) 1,0  
Present value of obligations 30 September 2013        
(R’million) 580,9 654,3 521,0  
% change   12,6 (10,3)  
* The amounts have been restated due to the adoption of IAS 19R.

  GROUP  
  Base case      Expected retirement age  
2014        
Key assumption 60/63/65
years
1 year
younger
1 year
older
 
Present value of obligations 30 September 2014        
(R’million) 626,4 630,7 620,9  
% change   0,7 (0,9)  
2013 (restated)*        
Key assumption 60/63/65
years
1 year
younger
1 year
older
 
Present value of obligations 30 September 2013        
(R’million) 580,9 584,7 576,8  
% change   0,7 (0,7)  
* The amounts have been restated due to the adoption of IAS 19R.

(R’million) 2014   Restated*
2013
2012 2011 2010  
Trend information              
Present value of obligations (626,4)   (580,9) (584,4) (544,3) (499,3)  
Present value of obligations in excess of plan assets (626,4)   (580,9) (584,4) (544,3) (499,3)  
Experience adjustments (5,9)   (2,2) (9,8) 1,6 17,4  
Actuarial (gains)/losses before              
changes in assumptions:              
In respect of present value of obligations (5,9)   (2,2) (9,8) 1,6 17,4  
* The amounts have been restated due to the adoption of IAS 19R.

The duration of the liability at 30 September 2014 is 13,0 years (2013: 12,9 years).


NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS l NOTE 35