| 34 | Pension obligations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The company and its subsidiaries contribute to retirement plans that cover all employees. The retirement plans are either defined benefit plans or defined contribution plans and are funded. The assets of the funds are held in independent trustee administered funds, administered in terms of the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956, as amended. In terms of the Pension Funds Act, certain of the retirement funds are exempt from actuarial valuation. Those funds not exempt from valuation must, in terms of the Pension Funds Act, be valued at least every three years. For purposes of these disclosures, and in order to comply with the requirements of IAS 19, valuations have been performed by independent actuaries, using the projected unit credit method. Where valuations were not possible due to the limited availability of complete data, roll-forward projections of prior completed actuarial valuations were used, taking account of actual subsequent experience.
Within the company’s group of subsidiaries, there are a total of 22 retirement plans, three of which are defined benefit pension funds, five are defined contribution pension funds, two are defined benefit provident funds and eight are defined contribution provident funds. There are a further four schemes of insurance into which the company and its subsidiaries contribute. Certain companies within the group sponsor external death, funeral and disability benefit insurance policies. These insurance costs have been allowed for in the disclosures provided. All of the funds above are funded with one exception. The actual return on plan assets for the period 1 October 2014 to 30 September 2015 was R32,1 million (2014: R31,6 million). This compares with the expected return for the same period of R33,9 million (2014: R39,6 million). The value of contributions expected to be paid by group companies for the year ending 30 September 2016 amounts to R240,4 million (2015 actual: R228,1 million). As at 30 September 2015, there were no properties occupied by, or other assets used by, group companies which formed part of the fair value of plan assets (2014: Rnil). As at 30 September 2015, the percentage of the fair value of plan assets in respect of defined benefit arrangements invested in Tiger Brands Limited shares amounted to 0% (2014: 0%). Major categories of plan assets in respect of defined benefit arrangements as at 30 September:
The disclosure of the funded status is for accounting purposes only, and does not necessarily indicate any assets available to the company or its subsidiaries. Once a surplus apportionment exercise is completed, and approved by the Registrar of Pension Funds in terms of the provisions of the Pension Funds Second Amendment Act, 2001, only at that stage would it be appropriate for the company or its subsidiaries to recognise any assets in respect of the retirement funds, to the extent that they are apportioned such assets. The surplus apportionment schemes for the Tiger Brands Defined Benefit Pension Fund and the Beacon Products Staff Pension Fund were approved by the Registrar in 2008. The surplus apportionment scheme for the ICS Pension Fund was approved in 2011. Where appropriate, surplus apportioned to the company has been recognised on the statement of financial position. This legislation is not applicable to arrangements not registered in terms of the Pension Funds Act, such as special purpose entities established for purposes of providing disability benefits.
The risks faced by the group as a result of pension obligations can be summarised as follows:
The sensitivity analysis has been prepared for the Tiger Brands Defined Benefit Pension Fund and the Nestlé Pension Fund. The liabilities of the Tiger Brands PRDBS Provident Fund and the ICS Pension Fund are not sensitive to changes in either the discount rate or the inflation rate. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance 2015 |
+1% | –1% | |||||
| Discount rate | ||||||||
| Defined benefit obligation (R’million) | (256,5) | (250,2) | (263,6) | |||||
| Change (%) | (2,5) | 2,8 | ||||||
| Inflation rate | ||||||||
| Defined benefit obligation (R’million) | (256,5) | (263,2) | (250,4) | |||||
| Change (%) | 2,6 | (2,4) |